Yize kungahle kubonakale kuyinto ejwayelekile kwifilimu eqanjiwe kunokuthile okubambekayo ngempela, iqiniso ukuthi, okungenani eConnecticut okwamanje, abezokuphepha sebenemvume esemthethweni yokusebenzisa ama-drones afakwe izikhali ezibulalayo.
Kuyiqiniso ukuthi sikhuluma ngo imithethonqubo yezomthetho ephayona njengamanje Kepha, ngokwazi kusengaphambili ukuthi sikhuluma ngezwe lapho umthethosisekelo uqaphela ilungelo lokuthi isakhamuzi ngasinye singaba nesikhali sokuvikela impahla yaso, impela kungekudala sizofinyelela kwamanye amadolobha noma izifunda.
Umbutho wamaphoyisa aseConnecticut, ngokomthetho, angasebenzisa ama-drones ahlomile.
Ukuthola imininingwane ethe xaxa, ngikutshele ukuthi lo mthetho omusha uvunyelwe ezinsukwini ezimbalwa ezedlule yikomidi lezomthetho lapho bobabili amaDemokhrasi namaRiphabhulikhi bavumelana khona ukuthi kufanele uqhubeke, kunjalo ukuthi, ngokwamarekhodi, ivoti liphele ngamavoti angama-34 evuna kwathi ayisikhombisa aphikiswa.
Njengoba bekungeke kube ngenye indlela, kubavikeli benkululeko yomphakathi sibhekene nesinyathelo lapho okuphikisana nalokho okuhlosiwe kuzotholakala khona kusukela kulokhu ayenzi izakhamizi zase-U.S. ziphephe. Ngokwabo, abasekeli balesi siphakamiso bamemezela ukuthi lolu hlobo olukhetheke kakhulu lwama-drones ahlomile luzosetshenziswa kuphela ezimweni ezinomkhawulo kakhulu futhi akufanele lubonwe njengokuzenzakalela kokusetshenziswa kwamandla.
Ngasohlangothini lwayo, iConnecticut Police Chiefs Association, okuyiyo ezonquma ukuthi izobusebenzisa nini lobu buchwepheshe nokuthi nini, imemezele lokho akekho ofuna ukuphatha i-drones ngenhloso yokuhlasela futhi lokhu kuzoba ngumthombo wobuchwepheshe kuphela ukuze ukwazi ukuvikela noma yisiphi isakhamuzi. Ngokulandelayo, bakhombisa ukuthi, kubo, into enhle kakhulu kungaba ukusetshenziswa kwezikhali ezilawulwa kepha azikwazi ukuvalwa ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi ama-drones ahlomile awakwazi ukusetshenziswa ngokuzayo.